Brazil vs Russia: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) … gaps
Brazil
16.15 billion
in 2024
Russia
16.36 billion
in 2021
Brazil rank
23rd
Russia rank
22nd
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) … gaps over time
- Brazil
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 16.36 billion against 16.15 billion in Brazil, a difference of 205.70 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 23rd and Russia ranks 22nd of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.92 billion | 1.97 billion | 948.08 million | Brazil |
| 2000s | 4.81 billion | 5.01 billion | 204.04 million | Russia |
| 2010s | 9.37 billion | 15.49 billion | 6.12 billion | Russia |
| 2020s | 11.05 billion | 14.65 billion | 3.61 billion | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Brazil or Russia?
- Russia, at 16.36 billion against 16.15 billion in Brazil as of 2021.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Brazil and Russia?
- 205.70 million, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Russia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and Russia rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Brazil ranks 23rd and Russia ranks 22nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.