Croatia vs Serbia: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Croatia
1.82 billion
in 2024
Serbia
1.80 billion
in 2024
Croatia rank
60th
Serbia rank
61st
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Croatia
- Serbia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1.82 billion against 1.80 billion in Serbia, a difference of 24.09 million.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 61st of 194 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 858.44 million | 470.99 million | 387.46 million | Croatia |
| 2010s | 779.66 million | 641.86 million | 137.80 million | Croatia |
| 2020s | 1.47 billion | 1.45 billion | 14.22 million | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Croatia or Serbia?
- Croatia, at 1.82 billion against 1.80 billion in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Croatia and Serbia?
- 24.09 million, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Serbia rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Croatia ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 61st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.