Cuba vs Malta: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Cuba
301.85 million
in 2022
Malta
304.23 million
in 2024
Cuba rank
122nd
Malta rank
119th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Cuba
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 304.23 million against 301.85 million in Cuba, a difference of 2.38 million.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 122nd and Malta ranks 119th of 194 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 172.21 million | 51.36 million | 120.85 million | Cuba |
| 2000s | 220.15 million | 90.05 million | 130.10 million | Cuba |
| 2010s | 473.47 million | 134.66 million | 338.81 million | Cuba |
| 2020s | 296.11 million | 177.70 million | 118.41 million | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Cuba or Malta?
- Malta, at 304.23 million against 301.85 million in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Cuba and Malta?
- 2.38 million, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Malta rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Cuba ranks 122nd and Malta ranks 119th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.