Cuba vs Mozambique: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Cuba
301.85 million
in 2022
Mozambique
303.70 million
in 2024
Cuba rank
122nd
Mozambique rank
120th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Cuba
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 303.70 million against 301.85 million in Cuba, a difference of 1.85 million.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 122nd and Mozambique ranks 120th of 194 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 220.15 million | 45.07 million | 175.08 million | Cuba |
| 2010s | 473.47 million | 242.15 million | 231.32 million | Cuba |
| 2020s | 296.11 million | 291.89 million | 4.22 million | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Cuba or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 303.70 million against 301.85 million in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Cuba and Mozambique?
- 1.85 million, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mozambique?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Cuba and Mozambique rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Cuba ranks 122nd and Mozambique ranks 120th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.