Serbia and Montenegro vs Zimbabwe: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Serbia and Montenegro
388.79 million
in 2004
Zimbabwe
416.98 million
in 2024
Serbia and Montenegro rank
108th
Zimbabwe rank
105th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 416.98 million against 388.79 million in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 28.19 million.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Serbia and Montenegro's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 194 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Serbia and Montenegro or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 416.98 million against 388.79 million in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Serbia and Montenegro and Zimbabwe?
- 28.19 million, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2004.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Zimbabwe rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 108th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.