Luxembourg vs Serbia: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Luxembourg
1.73 billion
in 2024
Serbia
1.80 billion
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
62nd
Serbia rank
61st
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Luxembourg
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.80 billion against 1.73 billion in Luxembourg, a difference of 69.09 million.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 62nd and Serbia ranks 61st of 194 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 379.01 million | 470.99 million | 91.98 million | Serbia |
| 2010s | 572.23 million | 641.86 million | 69.63 million | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1.36 billion | 1.45 billion | 90.05 million | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Luxembourg or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1.80 billion against 1.73 billion in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Luxembourg and Serbia?
- 69.09 million, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Serbia rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Luxembourg ranks 62nd and Serbia ranks 61st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.