Malawi vs Tajikistan: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Malawi
91.14 million
in 2024
Tajikistan
103.27 million
in 2023
Malawi rank
146th
Tajikistan rank
144th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Malawi
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 103.27 million against 91.14 million in Malawi, a difference of 12.13 million.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Malawi ranks 146th and Tajikistan ranks 144th of 194 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70.89 million | 100.19 million | 29.31 million | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 82.13 million | 120.10 million | 37.97 million | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Malawi or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 103.27 million against 91.14 million in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Malawi and Tajikistan?
- 12.13 million, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tajikistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Tajikistan rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Malawi ranks 146th and Tajikistan ranks 144th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.