Malta vs Mozambique: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Malta
304.23 million
in 2024
Mozambique
303.70 million
in 2024
Malta rank
119th
Mozambique rank
120th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Malta
- Mozambique
How they compare
Malta currently reports 304.23 million against 303.70 million in Mozambique, a difference of 527,000.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mozambique ahead.
Malta ranks 119th and Mozambique ranks 120th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.30 million | 51.64 million | 44.66 million | Malta |
| 2010s | 119.78 million | 332.35 million | 212.57 million | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 231.75 million | 318.06 million | 86.31 million | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Malta or Mozambique?
- Malta, at 304.23 million against 303.70 million in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Malta and Mozambique?
- 527,000, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mozambique?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Mozambique rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Malta ranks 119th and Mozambique ranks 120th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.