Malta vs Namibia: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Malta
304.23 million
in 2024
Namibia
306.18 million
in 2024
Malta rank
119th
Namibia rank
118th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 306.18 million against 304.23 million in Malta, a difference of 1.95 million.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 119th and Namibia ranks 118th of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.30 million | 69.86 million | 26.44 million | Malta |
| 2010s | 119.78 million | 180.45 million | 60.67 million | Namibia |
| 2020s | 231.75 million | 184.07 million | 47.69 million | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Malta or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 306.18 million against 304.23 million in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Malta and Namibia?
- 1.95 million, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Malta ranks 119th and Namibia ranks 118th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.