Philippines vs Uzbekistan: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Philippines
4.28 billion
in 2024
Uzbekistan
4.49 billion
in 2024
Philippines rank
43rd
Uzbekistan rank
42nd
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Philippines
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 4.49 billion against 4.28 billion in Philippines, a difference of 210.84 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 43rd and Uzbekistan ranks 42nd of 194 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.39 billion | 1.35 billion | 3.04 billion | Philippines |
| 2020s | 4.52 billion | 2.37 billion | 2.15 billion | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Philippines or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 4.49 billion against 4.28 billion in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Philippines and Uzbekistan?
- 210.84 million, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Uzbekistan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Philippines and Uzbekistan rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Philippines ranks 43rd and Uzbekistan ranks 42nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.