Qatar vs Slovenia: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps
Qatar
2.33 billion
in 2023
Slovenia
2.68 billion
in 2024
Qatar rank
55th
Slovenia rank
52nd
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps over time
- Qatar
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 2.68 billion against 2.33 billion in Qatar, a difference of 354.98 million.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.2 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Slovenia ahead.
Qatar ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 52nd of 194 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.05 billion | 618.42 million | 434.79 million | Qatar |
| 2010s | 1.24 billion | 1.12 billion | 122.86 million | Qatar |
| 2020s | 1.74 billion | 2.13 billion | 388.17 million | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps, Qatar or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 2.68 billion against 2.33 billion in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps between Qatar and Slovenia?
- 354.98 million, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Slovenia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Qatar and Slovenia rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), gaps?
- Qatar ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 52nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 96 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.