Brazil vs Libya: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per
Brazil
76.2 units per person
in 2024
Libya
71.96 units per person
in 2019
Brazil rank
107th
Libya rank
109th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time
- Brazil
- Libya
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 76.2 units per person against 71.96 units per person in Libya, a difference of 4.24 units per person.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 107th and Libya ranks 109th of 186 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 39.1 units per person | 157.52 units per person | 118.43 units per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 42.11 units per person | 93.32 units per person | 51.22 units per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Brazil or Libya?
- Brazil, at 76.2 units per person against 71.96 units per person in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Brazil and Libya?
- 4.24 units per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Libya?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Libya rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?
- Brazil ranks 107th and Libya ranks 109th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.