What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Central African Republic and Tuvalu?

0.49 units per person, with Central African Republic ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Tuvalu?

9 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2008.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Central African Republic vs Tuvalu: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per

Central African Republic

4.57 units per person

in 2024

Tuvalu

4.08 units per person

in 2008

Central African Republic rank

177th

Tuvalu rank

180th

Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time

Central African Republic
Tuvalu

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 4.57 units per person against 4.08 units per person in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.49 units per person.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 177th and Tuvalu ranks 180th of 186 countries.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Central African Republic	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.906 units per person	35.23 units per person	34.32 units per person	Tuvalu
2000s	0.5926 units per person	12.65 units per person	12.06 units per person	Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Central African Republic or Tuvalu?: Central African Republic, at 4.57 units per person against 4.08 units per person in Tuvalu as of 2024.
What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Central African Republic and Tuvalu?: 0.49 units per person, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Tuvalu?: 9 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2008.
How do Central African Republic and Tuvalu rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?: Central African Republic ranks 177th and Tuvalu ranks 180th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Tuvalu: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-capita/central-african-republic/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-capita/central-african-republic/tuvalu/">Central African Republic vs Tuvalu: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per capita
Unit: units per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 187 places, 4,778 data points, 1994–2024
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.