Malawi vs Tuvalu: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per
Malawi
4.21 units per person
in 2024
Tuvalu
4.08 units per person
in 2008
Malawi rank
179th
Tuvalu rank
180th
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time
- Malawi
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 4.21 units per person against 4.08 units per person in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.13 units per person.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 179th and Tuvalu ranks 180th of 186 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.87 units per person | 39.15 units per person | 37.28 units per person | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 1.25 units per person | 12.65 units per person | 11.4 units per person | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Malawi or Tuvalu?
- Malawi, at 4.21 units per person against 4.08 units per person in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Malawi and Tuvalu?
- 0.13 units per person, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tuvalu?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2008.
- How do Malawi and Tuvalu rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?
- Malawi ranks 179th and Tuvalu ranks 180th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.