Ethiopia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per

Ethiopia
729.53 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
781.58 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
154th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
151st

Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0200400600800199520092023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 781.58 units per square kilometre against 729.53 units per square kilometre in Ethiopia, a difference of 52.05 units per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 154th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 151st of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 27.99 units per square kilometre 48.89 units per square kilometre 20.9 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 117.15 units per square kilometre 122.08 units per square kilometre 4.94 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 571.21 units per square kilometre 380.56 units per square kilometre 190.65 units per square kilometre Ethiopia
2020s 543.23 units per square kilometre 554.15 units per square kilometre 10.92 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Ethiopia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 781.58 units per square kilometre against 729.53 units per square kilometre in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Ethiopia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
52.05 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?
Ethiopia ranks 154th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 151st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/ethiopia/tanzania/">Ethiopia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 4,651 data points, 1994–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.