Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per

Tanzania, United Republic of
781.58 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
924.83 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
151st
Zimbabwe rank
148th

Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
02004006008001.0k199520092023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 924.83 units per square kilometre against 781.58 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 143.25 units per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 45.62 units per square kilometre 284.35 units per square kilometre 238.73 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 122.08 units per square kilometre 98.52 units per square kilometre 23.56 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 380.56 units per square kilometre 344.61 units per square kilometre 35.95 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 554.15 units per square kilometre 825.31 units per square kilometre 271.16 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 924.83 units per square kilometre against 781.58 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
143.25 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
25 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for imports of low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), per?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 148th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/imports-of-low-carbon-technology-products-us-dollar-world-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 4,651 data points, 1994–2023
Last refreshed

Imports of low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.