Belarus vs Philippines: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Belarus
2.59
in 2014
Philippines
2.56
in 2014
Belarus rank
123rd
Philippines rank
125th
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Belarus
- Philippines
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2.59 against 2.56 in Philippines, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Philippines ahead.
Belarus ranks 123rd and Philippines ranks 125th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | 2.84 | 2.84 | Philippines |
| 1970s | 0 | 2.26 | 2.26 | Philippines |
| 1980s | 0 | 1.94 | 1.94 | Philippines |
| 1990s | 2.52 | 2.35 | 0.1694 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 3.76 | 3.1 | 0.666 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 3.33 | 2.67 | 0.6646 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Belarus or Philippines?
- Belarus, at 2.59 against 2.56 in Philippines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Belarus and Philippines?
- 0.03, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Philippines?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Belarus and Philippines rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Belarus ranks 123rd and Philippines ranks 125th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.