Burkina Faso vs Eswatini: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Burkina Faso
3.17
in 2014
Eswatini
3.17
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
90th
Eswatini rank
89th
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Burkina Faso
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3.17 against 3.17 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 90th and Eswatini ranks 89th of 189 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.51 | 0 | 2.51 | Burkina Faso |
| 1970s | 2.81 | 0 | 2.81 | Burkina Faso |
| 1980s | 3.14 | 0 | 3.14 | Burkina Faso |
| 1990s | 3.74 | 0 | 3.74 | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 3.22 | 3.03 | 0.1909 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 3.22 | 2.98 | 0.2478 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Burkina Faso or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 3.17 against 3.17 in Burkina Faso as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Burkina Faso and Eswatini?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Eswatini?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Eswatini rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Burkina Faso ranks 90th and Eswatini ranks 89th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.