Colombia vs Montserrat: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Colombia
3.48
in 2014
Montserrat
3.42
in 2014
Colombia rank
72nd
Montserrat rank
75th
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Colombia
- Montserrat
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 3.48 against 3.42 in Montserrat, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 72nd and Montserrat ranks 75th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Montserrat in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Montserrat | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.84 | 0 | 3.84 | Colombia |
| 1970s | 3.25 | 3.49 | 0.2377 | Montserrat |
| 1980s | 3.18 | 3.11 | 0.0717 | Colombia |
| 1990s | 2.62 | 3.5 | 0.885 | Montserrat |
| 2000s | 2.59 | 3.14 | 0.5579 | Montserrat |
| 2010s | 3.37 | 3.23 | 0.1465 | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Colombia or Montserrat?
- Colombia, at 3.48 against 3.42 in Montserrat as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Colombia and Montserrat?
- 0.06, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Montserrat?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Colombia and Montserrat rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Colombia ranks 72nd and Montserrat ranks 75th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.