Congo vs Zimbabwe: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Congo
3.88
in 2014
Zimbabwe
3.88
in 2014
Congo rank
53rd
Zimbabwe rank
52nd
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 3.88 against 3.88 in Congo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 189 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.08 | 1.65 | 1.43 | Congo |
| 1970s | 3.56 | 3.4 | 0.1695 | Congo |
| 1980s | 4.21 | 3.46 | 0.7516 | Congo |
| 1990s | 4.09 | 2.91 | 1.18 | Congo |
| 2000s | 4.52 | 3.06 | 1.45 | Congo |
| 2010s | 4.07 | 3.62 | 0.4545 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 3.88 against 3.88 in Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Congo ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 52nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.