Ecuador vs El Salvador: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Ecuador
3.08
in 2014
El Salvador
3.08
in 2014
Ecuador rank
97th
El Salvador rank
96th
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 3.08 against 3.08 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was El Salvador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 97th and El Salvador ranks 96th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and El Salvador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.39 | 2.94 | 0.4566 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 3.1 | 2.92 | 0.1819 | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 3.14 | 3.1 | 0.0343 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 2.83 | 3.09 | 0.2606 | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 2.99 | 3.39 | 0.4014 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 2.98 | 3.08 | 0.1029 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Ecuador or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 3.08 against 3.08 in Ecuador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Ecuador ranks 97th and El Salvador ranks 96th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.