Ecuador vs Sierra Leone: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Ecuador
3.08
in 2014
Sierra Leone
3
in 2014
Ecuador rank
97th
Sierra Leone rank
100th
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Ecuador
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 3.08 against 3 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 97th and Sierra Leone ranks 100th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.39 | 2.64 | 0.7592 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 3.1 | 2.75 | 0.3527 | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 3.14 | 3.07 | 0.0716 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 2.83 | 3.04 | 0.2078 | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 2.99 | 2.75 | 0.2441 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 2.98 | 2.83 | 0.1449 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Ecuador or Sierra Leone?
- Ecuador, at 3.08 against 3 in Sierra Leone as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Ecuador and Sierra Leone?
- 0.08, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sierra Leone?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and Sierra Leone rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Ecuador ranks 97th and Sierra Leone ranks 100th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.