Lebanon vs United States: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Lebanon
1.78
in 2014
United States
1.72
in 2014
Lebanon rank
177th
United States rank
180th
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Lebanon
- United States
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 1.78 against 1.72 in United States, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 177th and United States ranks 180th of 189 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.41 | 1.31 | 1.1 | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 1.55 | 1.37 | 0.1805 | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 1.93 | 1.4 | 0.5334 | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 1.91 | 1.48 | 0.4343 | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 1.84 | 1.56 | 0.2865 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 1.91 | 1.68 | 0.2273 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Lebanon or United States?
- Lebanon, at 1.78 against 1.72 in United States as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Lebanon and United States?
- 0.06, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and United States?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Lebanon and United States rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Lebanon ranks 177th and United States ranks 180th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.