Nepal vs Slovak Republic: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Nepal
2.46
in 2014
Slovak Republic
2.4
in 2014
Nepal rank
128th
Slovak Republic rank
131st
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Nepal
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 2.46 against 2.4 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 128th and Slovak Republic ranks 131st of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 5 and Slovak Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.67 | 0 | 2.67 | Nepal |
| 1970s | 2.9 | 0 | 2.9 | Nepal |
| 1980s | 2.89 | 0 | 2.89 | Nepal |
| 1990s | 3.08 | 1.12 | 1.96 | Nepal |
| 2000s | 2.54 | 2.12 | 0.4223 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 2.38 | 2.42 | 0.0386 | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Nepal or Slovak Republic?
- Nepal, at 2.46 against 2.4 in Slovak Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Nepal and Slovak Republic?
- 0.06, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Slovak Republic?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Nepal and Slovak Republic rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Nepal ranks 128th and Slovak Republic ranks 131st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.