Netherlands vs Sweden: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Netherlands
1.93
in 2014
Sweden
1.93
in 2014
Netherlands rank
169th
Sweden rank
166th
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Netherlands
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1.93 against 1.93 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sweden ahead.
Netherlands ranks 169th and Sweden ranks 166th of 189 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1 | 1.73 | 0.7269 | Sweden |
| 1970s | 1.1 | 1.57 | 0.4717 | Sweden |
| 1980s | 1.24 | 1.59 | 0.3455 | Sweden |
| 1990s | 1.22 | 1.77 | 0.546 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 1.43 | 1.79 | 0.3629 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 2.02 | 1.96 | 0.056 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Netherlands or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1.93 against 1.93 in Netherlands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Netherlands and Sweden?
- 0, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Sweden?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Netherlands and Sweden rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Netherlands ranks 169th and Sweden ranks 166th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.