Nigeria vs Solomon Islands: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Nigeria
4.84
in 2014
Solomon Islands
4.85
in 2014
Nigeria rank
21st
Solomon Islands rank
19th
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Nigeria
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 4.85 against 4.84 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Nigeria ahead.
Nigeria ranks 21st and Solomon Islands ranks 19th of 189 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.09 | 0 | 3.09 | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 4.87 | 4.11 | 0.7619 | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 5.3 | 4.15 | 1.15 | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 5.15 | 4.43 | 0.7196 | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 5.14 | 4.77 | 0.3688 | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 4.85 | 4.83 | 0.0225 | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Nigeria or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 4.85 against 4.84 in Nigeria as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Nigeria and Solomon Islands?
- 0.01, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Solomon Islands?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Nigeria and Solomon Islands rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Nigeria ranks 21st and Solomon Islands ranks 19th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.