Papua New Guinea vs Rwanda: Intensive Margin, Theil index
Papua New Guinea
3.69
in 2014
Rwanda
3.74
in 2014
Papua New Guinea rank
62nd
Rwanda rank
61st
Intensive Margin, Theil index over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 3.74 against 3.69 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.05.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 62nd and Rwanda ranks 61st of 189 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.96 | 3.91 | 1.95 | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 3.29 | 5.04 | 1.75 | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 3.72 | 5.24 | 1.51 | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 3.1 | 4.82 | 1.72 | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 3.05 | 4.28 | 1.22 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 3.49 | 3.88 | 0.3882 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intensive margin, theil index, Papua New Guinea or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 3.74 against 3.69 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in intensive margin, theil index between Papua New Guinea and Rwanda?
- 0.05, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Rwanda?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2014.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for intensive margin, theil index?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 62nd and Rwanda ranks 61st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Intensive Margin, Theil index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Covers 200 countries with data from 1962 to 2014. It has three main indicators: the Export Diversification Index, which can be disaggregated into sub-indices covering the Extensive Margin and the Intensive Margin. As these are Theil indices, higher values for all three correspond to lower export diversification.