Angola vs Eswatini: Intermediate goods imports, manufactures
Angola
400.30 million current US$
in 1997
Eswatini
560.44 million current US$
in 2011
Angola rank
19th
Eswatini rank
16th
Intermediate goods imports, manufactures over time
- Angola
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 560.44 million current US$ against 400.30 million current US$ in Angola, a difference of 160.14 million current US$.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 19th and Eswatini ranks 16th of 39 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 154.00 million current US$ | 104.29 million current US$ | 49.71 million current US$ | Angola |
| 1990s | 169.68 million current US$ | 230.65 million current US$ | 60.98 million current US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher intermediate goods imports, manufactures, Angola or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 560.44 million current US$ against 400.30 million current US$ in Angola as of 2011.
- What is the difference in intermediate goods imports, manufactures between Angola and Eswatini?
- 160.14 million current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Eswatini?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1997.
- How do Angola and Eswatini rank globally for intermediate goods imports, manufactures?
- Angola ranks 19th and Eswatini ranks 16th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank country economists, published as Intermediate goods imports, manufactures (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imports of manufactures (SITC 5 through 9 excluding 68) in current US dollars. Values are on c.i.f. basis.