Central Asia vs Latvia: Manure spreaders and Fertiliser distributors — Export Quantity
Manure spreaders and Fertiliser distributors — Export Quantity over time
- Central Asia
- Latvia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 2,016 No against 589 No in Latvia, a difference of 1,427 No.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 3.4 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Latvia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 22nd of 17 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher manure spreaders and fertiliser distributors — export quantity, Central Asia or Latvia?
- Central Asia, at 2,016 No against 589 No in Latvia as of 2008.
- What is the difference in manure spreaders and fertiliser distributors — export quantity between Central Asia and Latvia?
- 1,427 No, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2008.
- How do Central Asia and Latvia rank globally for manure spreaders and fertiliser distributors — export quantity?
- Central Asia ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 22nd of 17 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Manure spreaders and Fertiliser distributors — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.