Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa vs Sudan: Migrant remittance inflows

Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
30.10 billion current US$
in 2011
Sudan
1.42 billion current US$
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa rank
4th
Sudan rank
7th

Migrant remittance inflows over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
  • Sudan
010.0B20.0B30.0B197719942011

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa currently reports 30.10 billion current US$ against 1.42 billion current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 28.68 billion current US$.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa's figure about 21.2 times Sudan's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ranks 4th and Sudan ranks 7th of 6 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa Sudan Difference Ahead
1990s 3.50 billion current US$ 418.48 million current US$ 3.08 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
2000s 15.03 billion current US$ 1.42 billion current US$ 13.62 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa
2010s 29.14 billion current US$ 1.42 billion current US$ 27.72 billion current US$ Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher migrant remittance inflows, Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa or Sudan?
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa, at 30.10 billion current US$ against 1.42 billion current US$ in Sudan as of 2011.
What is the difference in migrant remittance inflows between Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Sudan?
28.68 billion current US$, with Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Sudan?
16 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Sudan rank globally for migrant remittance inflows?
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa ranks 4th and Sudan ranks 7th of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank staff estimates based on the International Monetary Fund's Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2008, published as Migrant remittance inflows (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa vs Sudan: Migrant remittance inflows. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank staff estimates based on the International Monetary Fund's Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2008. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/migrant-remittance-inflows-current-us/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://trade.statizoid.com/compare/migrant-remittance-inflows-current-us/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa/sudan/">Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa vs Sudan: Migrant remittance inflows</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Migrant remittance inflows (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank staff estimates based on the International Monetary Fund's Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2008
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
56 places, 1,426 data points, 1970–2011
Last refreshed

Migrants’ remittances are defined as the sum of worker’s remittances,