Congo vs Namibia: Migrant remittance inflows
Congo
0.2%
in 2007
Namibia
0.1%
in 2011
Congo rank
43rd
Namibia rank
45th
Migrant remittance inflows over time
- Congo
- Namibia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in Namibia, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.
Congo ranks 43rd and Namibia ranks 45th of 50 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher migrant remittance inflows, Congo or Namibia?
- Congo, at 0.2% against 0.1% in Namibia as of 2007.
- What is the difference in migrant remittance inflows between Congo and Namibia?
- 0.1%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2007.
- How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for migrant remittance inflows?
- Congo ranks 43rd and Namibia ranks 45th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on the International Monetary Fund's Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2008, and World Bank and OECD GDP estimates, published as Migrant remittance inflows (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Migrants’ remittances are defined as the sum of worker’s remittances,