Eswatini vs Guinea: Migrant remittance inflows
Eswatini
1.3%
in 2011
Guinea
1.5%
in 2011
Eswatini rank
30th
Guinea rank
29th
Migrant remittance inflows over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 1.5% against 1.3% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 30th and Guinea ranks 29th of 50 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 13.1% | 0.4% | 12.8% | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 4.9% | 0.1% | 4.8% | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 3.4% | 1.6% | 1.9% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.0% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher migrant remittance inflows, Eswatini or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 1.5% against 1.3% in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in migrant remittance inflows between Eswatini and Guinea?
- 0.2%, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea rank globally for migrant remittance inflows?
- Eswatini ranks 30th and Guinea ranks 29th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on the International Monetary Fund's Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2008, and World Bank and OECD GDP estimates, published as Migrant remittance inflows (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Migrants’ remittances are defined as the sum of worker’s remittances,