Mali vs Uganda: Migrant remittance inflows
Mali
4.4%
in 2011
Uganda
5.6%
in 2011
Mali rank
13th
Uganda rank
10th
Migrant remittance inflows over time
- Mali
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 5.6% against 4.4% in Mali, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.3 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Uganda ahead.
Mali ranks 13th and Uganda ranks 10th of 50 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.4% | 3.9% | 0.5% | Uganda |
| 2000s | 3.9% | 4.7% | 0.8% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 4.7% | 5.1% | 0.4% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher migrant remittance inflows, Mali or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 5.6% against 4.4% in Mali as of 2011.
- What is the difference in migrant remittance inflows between Mali and Uganda?
- 1.2%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Uganda?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2011.
- How do Mali and Uganda rank globally for migrant remittance inflows?
- Mali ranks 13th and Uganda ranks 10th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on the International Monetary Fund's Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2008, and World Bank and OECD GDP estimates, published as Migrant remittance inflows (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Migrants’ remittances are defined as the sum of worker’s remittances,