Chad vs Mauritius: Migrant remittance outflows
Chad
15.42 million current US$
in 1994
Mauritius
11.30 million current US$
in 2011
Chad rank
37th
Mauritius rank
40th
Migrant remittance outflows over time
- Chad
- Mauritius
How they compare
Chad currently reports 15.42 million current US$ against 11.30 million current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 4.12 million current US$.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 37th and Mauritius ranks 40th of 49 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 9.46 million current US$ | 1.21 million current US$ | 8.25 million current US$ | Chad |
| 1980s | 14.25 million current US$ | 1.18 million current US$ | 13.07 million current US$ | Chad |
| 1990s | 36.20 million current US$ | 1.29 million current US$ | 34.92 million current US$ | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher migrant remittance outflows, Chad or Mauritius?
- Chad, at 15.42 million current US$ against 11.30 million current US$ in Mauritius as of 1994.
- What is the difference in migrant remittance outflows between Chad and Mauritius?
- 4.12 million current US$, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mauritius?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1994.
- How do Chad and Mauritius rank globally for migrant remittance outflows?
- Chad ranks 37th and Mauritius ranks 40th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on the International Monetary Fund's Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2008, published as Migrant remittance outflows (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Migrants’ remittances are defined as the sum of worker’s remittances,