Congo vs Tanzania: Migrant remittance outflows
Congo
102.24 million current US$
in 2007
Tanzania
115.60 million current US$
in 2011
Congo rank
11th
Tanzania rank
10th
Migrant remittance outflows over time
- Congo
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 115.60 million current US$ against 102.24 million current US$ in Congo, a difference of 13.36 million current US$.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 49 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 9.43 million current US$ | 6.09 million current US$ | 3.34 million current US$ | Congo |
| 1990s | 36.14 million current US$ | 4.28 million current US$ | 31.87 million current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 55.09 million current US$ | 30.03 million current US$ | 25.07 million current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher migrant remittance outflows, Congo or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 115.60 million current US$ against 102.24 million current US$ in Congo as of 2011.
- What is the difference in migrant remittance outflows between Congo and Tanzania?
- 13.36 million current US$, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tanzania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2007.
- How do Congo and Tanzania rank globally for migrant remittance outflows?
- Congo ranks 11th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank staff estimates based on the International Monetary Fund's Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook 2008, published as Migrant remittance outflows (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Migrants’ remittances are defined as the sum of worker’s remittances,