Finland vs South Africa: Ploughs (e.g. reversible and non-reversible ploughs) — Import Value
Ploughs (e.g. reversible and non-reversible ploughs) — Import Value over time
- Finland
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 811 1000 USD against 774 1000 USD in Finland, a difference of 37 1000 USD.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 54th and South Africa ranks 52nd of 144 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ploughs (e.g. reversible and non-reversible ploughs) — import value, Finland or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 811 1000 USD against 774 1000 USD in Finland as of 2007.
- What is the difference in ploughs (e.g. reversible and non-reversible ploughs) — import value between Finland and South Africa?
- 37 1000 USD, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and South Africa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2007.
- How do Finland and South Africa rank globally for ploughs (e.g. reversible and non-reversible ploughs) — import value?
- Finland ranks 54th and South Africa ranks 52nd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ploughs (e.g. reversible and non-reversible ploughs) — Import Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Important notice: FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery is no longer active. The latest online version of the database has as reference year 2009 (with data collected in year 2011). FAOSTAT database on Agriculture Machinery provides statistical series on Agricultural Machinery and Equipment statistical series referring to the following items: tractors, harvesters and threshers, irrigation pumps, milking machines, hand tools, and soil machines. The database includes estimates of agriculture machinery in use and value of import and export of agriculture machinery.