Cape Verde vs Eswatini: Tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, all products
Cape Verde
12.2%
in 2011
Eswatini
10.8%
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
2nd
Eswatini rank
3rd
Tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, all products over time
- Cape Verde
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 12.2% against 10.8% in Eswatini, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 2nd and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 43 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.8% | 10.8% | 1.9% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 12.0% | 11.4% | 0.6% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, all products, Cape Verde or Eswatini?
- Cape Verde, at 12.2% against 10.8% in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, all products between Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 1.4%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Eswatini rank globally for tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, all products?
- Cape Verde ranks 2nd and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTD) and the World Trade Organization, published as Tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator reflects the total share of lines in the country’s MFN tariff schedule with the value above 3 times the simple average tariff. Expressed as a percentage of total lines. These shares are also reported disaggregated for agricultural goods and non-agricultural goods.