Eswatini vs Mauritius: Tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, primary
Eswatini
8.3%
in 2011
Mauritius
7.2%
in 2011
Eswatini rank
4th
Mauritius rank
5th
Tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, primary over time
- Eswatini
- Mauritius
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 8.3% against 7.2% in Mauritius, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritius ahead.
Eswatini ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 5th of 43 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.8% | 25.7% | 13.9% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 10.5% | 11.3% | 0.8% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, primary, Eswatini or Mauritius?
- Eswatini, at 8.3% against 7.2% in Mauritius as of 2011.
- What is the difference in tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, primary between Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 1.1%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, primary?
- Eswatini ranks 4th and Mauritius ranks 5th of 43 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTD) and the World Trade Organization, published as Tariff barriers, share of lines domestic peaks, primary (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator reflects the total share of lines in the country’s MFN tariff schedule with the value above 3 times the simple average tariff. Expressed as a percentage of total lines. These shares are also reported disaggregated for agricultural goods and non-agricultural goods.