Angola vs Latvia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Angola
1.13 billion
in 2024
Latvia
1.13 billion
in 2024
Angola rank
81st
Latvia rank
79th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Angola
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.13 billion against 1.13 billion in Angola, a difference of 7.24 million.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Latvia ahead.
Angola ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 79th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 501.20 million | 384.14 million | 117.06 million | Angola |
| 2010s | 1.10 billion | 648.00 million | 447.37 million | Angola |
| 2020s | 888.91 million | 1.12 billion | 233.28 million | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Angola or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 1.13 billion against 1.13 billion in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Angola and Latvia?
- 7.24 million, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Latvia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Latvia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Angola ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 79th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.