Angola vs North Macedonia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Angola
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 1.13 billion against 1.04 billion in North Macedonia, a difference of 81.88 million.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 81st and North Macedonia ranks 83rd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 501.20 million | 111.51 million | 389.69 million | Angola |
| 2010s | 1.10 billion | 1.07 billion | 20.98 million | Angola |
| 2020s | 888.91 million | 1.17 billion | 278.09 million | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Angola or North Macedonia?
- Angola, at 1.13 billion against 1.04 billion in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Angola and North Macedonia?
- 81.88 million, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Angola and North Macedonia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Angola ranks 81st and North Macedonia ranks 83rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.