Argentina vs Serbia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Argentina
4.23 billion
in 2024
Serbia
3.35 billion
in 2024
Argentina rank
48th
Serbia rank
51st
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Argentina
- Serbia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 4.23 billion against 3.35 billion in Serbia, a difference of 881.31 million.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.3 times Serbia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 51st of 187 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.39 billion | 777.21 million | 1.61 billion | Argentina |
| 2010s | 3.64 billion | 1.19 billion | 2.45 billion | Argentina |
| 2020s | 3.76 billion | 2.73 billion | 1.03 billion | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Argentina or Serbia?
- Argentina, at 4.23 billion against 3.35 billion in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Argentina and Serbia?
- 881.31 million, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Serbia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Argentina ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 51st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.