Aruba vs Cape Verde: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Aruba
34.58 million
in 2023
Cape Verde
35.65 million
in 2023
Aruba rank
165th
Cape Verde rank
163rd
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Aruba
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 35.65 million against 34.58 million in Aruba, a difference of 1.06 million.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 165th and Cape Verde ranks 163rd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Cape Verde in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.94 million | 21.30 million | 33.64 million | Aruba |
| 2010s | 28.58 million | 44.20 million | 15.62 million | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 31.10 million | 30.84 million | 259,400 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Aruba or Cape Verde?
- Cape Verde, at 35.65 million against 34.58 million in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Aruba and Cape Verde?
- 1.06 million, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Cape Verde?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Cape Verde rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Aruba ranks 165th and Cape Verde ranks 163rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.