Bangladesh vs Cambodia: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Bangladesh
1.28 billion
in 2015
Cambodia
1.19 billion
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
74th
Cambodia rank
77th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Bangladesh
- Cambodia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 1.28 billion against 1.19 billion in Cambodia, a difference of 88.43 million.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 74th and Cambodia ranks 77th of 187 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 316.19 million | 45.98 million | 270.21 million | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 978.84 million | 140.70 million | 838.13 million | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Bangladesh or Cambodia?
- Bangladesh, at 1.28 billion against 1.19 billion in Cambodia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Bangladesh and Cambodia?
- 88.43 million, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Cambodia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2015.
- How do Bangladesh and Cambodia rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Bangladesh ranks 74th and Cambodia ranks 77th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.