Bangladesh vs Ecuador: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Bangladesh
1.28 billion
in 2015
Ecuador
1.28 billion
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
74th
Ecuador rank
75th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Bangladesh
- Ecuador
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 1.28 billion against 1.28 billion in Ecuador, a difference of 850,000.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 74th and Ecuador ranks 75th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 123.05 million | 160.86 million | 37.81 million | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 316.19 million | 304.13 million | 12.06 million | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 978.84 million | 922.72 million | 56.12 million | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Bangladesh or Ecuador?
- Bangladesh, at 1.28 billion against 1.28 billion in Ecuador as of 2015.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Bangladesh and Ecuador?
- 850,000, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Ecuador?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2015.
- How do Bangladesh and Ecuador rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Bangladesh ranks 74th and Ecuador ranks 75th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.