Bangladesh vs Pakistan: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Bangladesh
1.28 billion
in 2015
Pakistan
1.39 billion
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
74th
Pakistan rank
72nd
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Bangladesh
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1.39 billion against 1.28 billion in Bangladesh, a difference of 104.04 million.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 74th and Pakistan ranks 72nd of 187 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 363.71 million | 945.47 million | 581.76 million | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 978.84 million | 1.55 billion | 574.82 million | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Bangladesh or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 1.39 billion against 1.28 billion in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Bangladesh and Pakistan?
- 104.04 million, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Pakistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Bangladesh and Pakistan rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Bangladesh ranks 74th and Pakistan ranks 72nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.