Barbados vs Botswana: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Barbados
142.61 million
in 2024
Botswana
135.88 million
in 2023
Barbados rank
136th
Botswana rank
137th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Barbados
- Botswana
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 142.61 million against 135.88 million in Botswana, a difference of 6.74 million.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 136th and Botswana ranks 137th of 187 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.34 million | 75.31 million | 38.97 million | Botswana |
| 2010s | 46.48 million | 193.48 million | 147.00 million | Botswana |
| 2020s | 100.26 million | 137.19 million | 36.93 million | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Barbados or Botswana?
- Barbados, at 142.61 million against 135.88 million in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Barbados and Botswana?
- 6.74 million, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Botswana?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Botswana rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Barbados ranks 136th and Botswana ranks 137th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.