Barbados vs Montenegro: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Barbados
- Montenegro
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 142.61 million against 129.35 million in Montenegro, a difference of 13.26 million.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Barbados ranks 136th and Montenegro ranks 139th of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.10 million | 78.41 million | 32.31 million | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 46.48 million | 74.73 million | 28.25 million | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 108.73 million | 102.08 million | 6.65 million | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Barbados or Montenegro?
- Barbados, at 142.61 million against 129.35 million in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Barbados and Montenegro?
- 13.26 million, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Montenegro rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Barbados ranks 136th and Montenegro ranks 139th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.