Belarus vs Jordan: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Belarus
2.02 billion
in 2021
Jordan
1.99 billion
in 2023
Belarus rank
64th
Jordan rank
65th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Belarus
- Jordan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2.02 billion against 1.99 billion in Jordan, a difference of 28.49 million.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 64th and Jordan ranks 65th of 187 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 290.35 million | 110.81 million | 179.53 million | Belarus |
| 2000s | 760.79 million | 362.47 million | 398.32 million | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1.80 billion | 901.62 million | 893.43 million | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.88 billion | 1.21 billion | 672.04 million | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Belarus or Jordan?
- Belarus, at 2.02 billion against 1.99 billion in Jordan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Belarus and Jordan?
- 28.49 million, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Jordan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and Jordan rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Belarus ranks 64th and Jordan ranks 65th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.