Belarus vs Qatar: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Belarus
2.02 billion
in 2021
Qatar
2.33 billion
in 2023
Belarus rank
64th
Qatar rank
63rd
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Belarus
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 2.33 billion against 2.02 billion in Belarus, a difference of 307.06 million.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Qatar ahead.
Belarus ranks 64th and Qatar ranks 63rd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 760.79 million | 1.07 billion | 304.94 million | Qatar |
| 2010s | 1.80 billion | 1.24 billion | 552.39 million | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1.88 billion | 1.47 billion | 408.49 million | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Belarus or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 2.33 billion against 2.02 billion in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Belarus and Qatar?
- 307.06 million, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Qatar?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and Qatar rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Belarus ranks 64th and Qatar ranks 63rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.