Belize vs Eswatini: Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World)
Belize
46.61 million
in 2024
Eswatini
40.20 million
in 2023
Belize rank
156th
Eswatini rank
159th
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) over time
- Belize
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belize currently reports 46.61 million against 40.20 million in Eswatini, a difference of 6.41 million.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Belize ranks 156th and Eswatini ranks 159th of 187 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.89 million | 20.10 million | 10.21 million | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 18.54 million | 29.06 million | 10.52 million | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 27.02 million | 37.53 million | 10.50 million | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world), Belize or Eswatini?
- Belize, at 46.61 million against 40.20 million in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world) between Belize and Eswatini?
- 6.41 million, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Eswatini?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Eswatini rank globally for total trade in low carbon technology products, us dollar (world)?
- Belize ranks 156th and Eswatini ranks 159th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total trade in low carbon technology products, US dollar (World) with 118 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.